Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	2.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$190 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 152 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 403 42% 340 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.2 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 18.8 16% 18.4 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 16.5 17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 70 56 44 37 44 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 235 Write 45.5 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 56 22% 100 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 12.7 67% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 49.9 75% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 125GB free Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 105 105 105 106 104 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 89 Write 90.5 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 104 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 7.3 7.2 6.7 5.5 5.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 15 SusWrite 7.4 21% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.4 100% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.1% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.9 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16