Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac16,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A369DDC4E67F1C45
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 18:21
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 128
51% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 206
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 0146) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 13.3
8% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 9.63
Splatting 14.8
9% 11 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 336 363 363 349 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 295
Write 346
Mixed 315
SusWrite 296
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 25.7
86% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 198
170% 248 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 102%
APPLE HD D HTS547550A9E38 500GB
134GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.79% Terrible
Read 2
Write 1.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2.3
3% 2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445364533303445452D45474346202020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 16.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac16,1 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback