MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '20 at 10:46
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 251 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 836 75% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,425 88% 1,425 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 177 Parallax 179 133% 173 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 167 Splatting 118 109% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 187 201 223 226 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 368 Write 357 Mixed 276 SusWrite 202 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 35.5 123% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 183 143% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 133%
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70 1,835 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 59GB free Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 338 379 336 302 311 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 418 Write 434 Mixed 288 SusWrite 343 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 35.3 131% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 220 164% 218 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 101%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 71GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 188 191 164 165 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 371 Write 371 Mixed 353 SusWrite 181 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 49.1 159% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 214 159% 211 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 39 38 39 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 130 Write 38.2 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 38 40% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 85%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 508GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 98 98 98 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 90 Write 99.5 Mixed 103 SusWrite 97.2 73% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 464% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 377GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 102 108 102 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 49.2 Write 73.3 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 100 55% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.4 170% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 97%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 46GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 186 185 190 179 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 252 Write 150 Mixed 127 SusWrite 184 227% 178 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 8.3 685% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 11.2 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 9.9 800% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 37.1 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 36.4 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,923x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,527x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,291x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	762x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	593x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	499x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	378x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	367x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	427x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	267x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	226x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $924

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16