Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2133 1,612 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 218 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 692 67% 553 Pts	64-Core 877 54% 877 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	25.2% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 22.8 Parallax 30.6 25% 28.1 fps	MRender 26.7 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 33.5 25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 25%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDATB8Y256G1001 256GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: 40102101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 393 Write 262 Mixed 202 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 27.4 91% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 202 184% 284 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC63 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 179 Mixed 84 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 1x16GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 8.4 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 8.5 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16