Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 04:11
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 289
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 910
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1386
86% 1386 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8730) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3775 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 51.7
Parallax 42.2
37% 46.3 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 58
46% 55.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 611 269 270 295 292 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,138
Write 1,260
Mixed 513
SusWrite 338
233% 1,062 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 56.1
230% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 1,192
DQ Mixed 729
664% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 227%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
7GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 479
Mixed 401
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 59.9
204% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 363
261% 333 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 160 166 166 139 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 131
Write 149
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 157
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
180GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 115 162 161 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 173
Write 110
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 130
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 112%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
7GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 20
Write 18.9
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 19.3
26% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZN 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 35.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 33.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback