Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer CH20
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190516
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '20 at 08:24
Run Duration	437 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 236 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 688 69% 560 Pts	64-Core 832 52% 832 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 79.1 Parallax 66.8 53% 70.3 fps	MRender 85.7 Gravity 60.1 Splatting 62.7 56% 69.5 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 512GB 11,097 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9001c00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 710 753 759 766 769 764 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,829 Write 727 Mixed 184 SusWrite 754 191% 873 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 42.5 157% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 437 DQ Mixed 386 280% 356 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 259%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 109GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.18% Terrible	Read 34 Write 32.8 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 14.2 6% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.4 24% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 9.18% Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 141 150 149 145 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 127 Mixed 88.9 SusWrite 143 89% 120 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 276% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 98%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 645GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 31.6 Write 36.9 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 40.6 26% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 92%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB 309 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 468GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.9% Terrible	Read 32.9 Write 36.3 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 13.9 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.9% Great: 53%
SANDISK SDDR-489 128GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 26GB free, PID cfc9 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 33 Write 35.4 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 13.5 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.7 245% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 22 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 21.7 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,071x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,447x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	597x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,755x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16