Asrock Z97 Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 04:53
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 317
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 114
88% 112 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 103
Splatting 84.1
76% 94.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,654
Write 4,102
Mixed 4,072
953% 4,276 MB/s
4K Read 370
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 225
941% 256 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 1,057
792% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
293GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 80.5
Write 76
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 98.4
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 68%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
286GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 64 66 66 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 59
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 64.8
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 16GB
13GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.5 3.2 3.6 2.4 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.2
7% 6.38 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 20.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Killer Builds (Compare 1,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $805
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback