| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS H61H2-MV (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131127 |
| Uptime | 12.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 01 '20 at 23:47 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
36.7%
Below average
|
41% 64.7 Pts
|
14% 101 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7DF5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
1.53%
Terrible
|
1% 1.56 fps
|
2% 2.13 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.1 8.2 8.2 14 44 MB/s
|
6.46%
Terrible
|
8% 10.2 MB/s
|
19% 0.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 6GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
|
26.9%
Poor
|
27% 9.37 GB/s
|
22% 7.67 GB/s
|
29% 138 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 932 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS H61H2-MV - $189
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 95x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 89x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 279x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 77x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $276 |