Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 15:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 106
2-Core 215
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 647
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 80 62 64 110 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 234
Write 58.5
Mixed 198
SusWrite 86.8
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 13.5
68% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 150
108% 146 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 93%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
602GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 173 174 172 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 178
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 172
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Adata DashDrive UV150 USB 3.0 16GB-$39
10GB free, PID dc1a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.23% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 17.8
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 15.7
25% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
46% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.23%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback