| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110309 |
| Uptime | 10.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '20 at 14:09 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
67.8%
Good
|
64% 104 Pts
|
36% 271 Pts
|
17% 273 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.09
|
3.08%
Terrible
|
3% 3.76 fps
|
3% 4.09 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
59GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 134 138 141 138 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
40% 178 MB/s
|
81% 29.3 MB/s
|
128% 173 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
877GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 134 136 136 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
85% 117 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 67 65 83 91 84 MB/s
|
42.1%
Average
|
47% 64.4 MB/s
|
109% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.7%
Average
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
59% 67.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z200 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |