Login LOG-BAT-I-PQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLogin LOG-BAT-I-PQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLogin LOG-BAT-I
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 18:45
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J2900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Memory 8.72
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 39.2
13% 24.1 Pts
4-Core 79.1
8-Core 70.5
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 71.6
4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7ED4) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.12 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 43 39 45 33 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 114
Write 99
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 44.1
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MS3512NSZ-HA3G1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 416
10% 416 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback