MSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 18:39
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$490
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 216
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 576
64% 493 Pts
64-Core 572
38% 572 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 450.82
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 177
Parallax 195
104% 167 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 177
Splatting 126
136% 142 fps
Poor: 118%
This bench: 119%
Great: 149%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 138 49 52 49 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 492
Write 433
Mixed 395
SusWrite 85.1
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 29
96% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 247
171% 219 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 94%
Kingston SA400S37240G 480GB
315GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 224 224 246 230 249 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 447
Write 393
Mixed 339
SusWrite 231
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 29.6
101% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 106
94% 148 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 141 149 140 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 136
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 144
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 114%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$69
408GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 96 93 96 92 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 90
Write 95
Mixed 46
SusWrite 93.8
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 85%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 282 283 296 281 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 314
Write 120
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 276
140% 194 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.5
387% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 169%
Great: 213%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
26GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 99 109 101 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 98.3
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 104
153% 132 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 7.6
642% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 8.9
673% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $471
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback