Foxconn A7DA 3 series

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Foxconn A7DA 3 series (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '20 at 16:40
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket 941, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 54.4 1-Core 43.7 2-Core 87.5 38% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 170 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 6000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 71 34 40 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.2% Below average	Read 203 Write 137 Mixed 142 SusWrite 57.4 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 16.6 54% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.7 DQ Write 45.5 DQ Mixed 24.9 22% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 298GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 110 111 112 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 110 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 58%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 125GB free Firmware: 0005HPM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 53.4 Write 47.2 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 56 34% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 43%
Maxtor 6Y120L0 123GB-$132 506 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 56GB free Firmware: YAR41BW0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 44 44 45 44 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 46.8 Write 47.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 43.6 32% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 31%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 930GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 186 Write 162 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 56.1 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 112%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 72 71 35 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 72 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 60 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 44%
WD WD3000JB-00KFA0 300GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 257GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 44 45 44 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 55.5 Write 57.3 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 43.7 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 33%
SAMSUNG HM500LI 500GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 333GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 34.7 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 39.1 44% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 18%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 242GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 22.9 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 14.4 28% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 613 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 293GB free, PID 0212 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 23.4 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 14.7 26% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 529GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 79 79 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	34% Below average	Read 80.9 Write 76.4 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 77.5 87% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown VS2GB1333D3 VS2GB1333D3 VS2GB1333D3 VS2GB1333D3 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 533, 533, 533, 533 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.3% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A7DA 3 series Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A7DA 3 series

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
600 240GBSeagate $215Bench 82%, 3,595 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
CL9-9-9 DDR3-16000 CL9-9-9 DDR3-16000 8GBUnknownBench 32%, 31 samples	1x
99177 99177 8GBUnknownBench 32%, 73 samples	1x
OCZ3P1333LV2G OCZ3P1333LV2G 4GBUnknownBench 28%, 24 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $720

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16