| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
| Memory | 15.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090728 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 12 '20 at 23:11 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.7%
Good
|
60% 98.4 Pts
|
36% 293 Pts
|
22% 354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
76.3%
Very good
|
73% 101 fps
|
83% 105 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 158 172 170 178 175 MB/s
|
50.7%
Above average
|
46% 202 MB/s
|
69% 23.1 MB/s
|
144% 195 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
429GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 108 108 108 108 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
80% 110 MB/s
|
193% 1.47 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
25GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 15 15 16 16 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
28% 22.1 MB/s
|
64% 1.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 2048 MB
|
42.9%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
30% 10.7 GB/s
|
55% 73.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 313x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 19x |
| Xeon X5550IntelBench 67%, 1,065 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |