Lenovo Lenovo C200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo Lenovo C200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 07:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom D525-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Memory 24.4
1-Core 7.9
2-Core 13.8
12% 15.4 Pts
4-Core 17.9
8-Core 21.7
3% 19.8 Pts
64-Core 28.7
2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 29%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$37
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 35 39 39 41 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 51
Write 54.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 40.1
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 1.2 GB/s
Latency 290
14% 290 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback