DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090728
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '20 at 21:21
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 36 2-Core 68.9 37% 56.4 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 252 24% 198 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 240 1,075 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0736) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Lighting 9 Reflection 9 Parallax 3.34 7% 7.11 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 6.87 Splatting 5.91 6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM04B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 100 102 103 103 102 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.5% Below average	Read 199 Write 115 Mixed 142 SusWrite 102 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 21.5 66% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 43.2 DQ Mixed 95.6 70% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 110%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 USB 2.0 16GB-$5 1,670 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.1 2.7 2.9 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 3.3 8% 7.52 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	314x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	19x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $39Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16