Mustek W65_67SR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mustek W65_67SR (all builds)
Motherboard	MUSTEK W65_67SR
Memory	5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131204
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '17 at 17:39
Run Duration	98 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 174 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 298 37% 281 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 0650) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 3.67 9% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.7b Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11124854 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 -15530601730587 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4233 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 133 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 50 72 25774522418 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11124854 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11124854 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11124854 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 20086 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13221 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13221 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12378	58.7% Above average	Read 461 Write 227 Mixed 246 68% 312 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 11.4 84% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 11.2 20% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 89%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 250GB-$45 1,340 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 233GB free Firmware: 0003DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 167061016 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2452 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 307605811 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7471 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1672 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 10 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 521732127 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 559 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 150 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10245 (C2) HDA temperature 31 46 42949672991 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 46 167061016 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -80062485359248 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2708368467 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2727832287 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 1 795 (FB) Unknown 100 1 78 (FC) Unknown 100 1 7 (FE) Unknown 1 1 8	55.4% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 96.5 Mixed 88.7 71% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.45 90% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 15.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Mustek W65_67SR

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)