Sony VPCEJ1M1E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Sony VPCEJ1M1E (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 15:38
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 83.4 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 114 56% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 144 21% 153 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 410M 4,608 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908B) 1GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 0.66 2% 1.58 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 0.13 1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 352GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.9 3.7 3.2 2.3 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 15 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 4.2 6% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 50%
Generic Compact Flash 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 1345 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.9 5.6 5.9 5.9 5.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.6 8% 6.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 19%
Hama Hama 32GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 4.7 12 11 9 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.17% Terrible	Read 29.4 Write 22 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 7.5 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 2.1 90% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.17% Great: 37%
Generic SDXC/MMC 8GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1345 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 0.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 0.6 5% 5.25 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 12%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 339GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 12 13 13 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 21.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 13.6 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 44%
331 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 4.8 Mixed 3 SusWrite 5.5 7% 6.15 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VPCEJ1M1E Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEJ1M1E

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce 410MNvidiaBench 1%, 4,608 samples	6x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	1x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16