Lenovo 4351CW8

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4351CW8 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 23:16
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 94 2-Core 205 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 508 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 29.1 Parallax 32.9 21% 29.2 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 25.3 Splatting 31 23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,859 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 188 146 113 114 208 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62% Good	Read 223 Write 120 Mixed 159 SusWrite 151 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 30.1 122% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 102 89% 135 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 163GB free Firmware: JC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 103 102 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 106 Write 103 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 103 69% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 69%
Kingston DT 101 G2 16GB 1,946 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 2.6 4% 5 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B1K70CM0- 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 10.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4351CW8 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4351CW8

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	4x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	1x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	1x

SSD
TS480GSSD220S 480GBTranscendBench 77%, 5,978 samples	1x
SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 2,125 samples	1x
SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 4,859 samples	1x

RAM
M392B1K70CM0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 50 samples	1x
36JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GBMicronBench 54%, 190 samples	1x
M393B5173QH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 93%, 24 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16