Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NT530U3C-A74
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150722
Uptime	14.9 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 03:31
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 119 57% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 167 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 3.57 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.72 3% 3.7 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.35 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 2,350 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT41K0Q Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 2,607 Mixed 45 275% 1,326 MB/s	4K Read 294 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 3.7 451% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 63%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,890 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 108GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.1 8.8 9.9 10 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 12.5 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 9.6 18% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.2 106% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 50GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 10.9 18% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2 148% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GB 808 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 9.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 6.4 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	95x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	38x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	167x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	16x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples	5x

SSD
i100 24GBSandiskBench 28%, 942 samples	20x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 808 samples	39x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F BA92-09550A 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 139 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16