Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 156% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '20 at 01:30
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 69.2 1-Core 157 2-Core 310 94% 179 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1,105 100% 839 Pts	64-Core 2,188 135% 2,188 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	154% Outstanding	Lighting 206 Reflection 234 Parallax 235 168% 225 fps	MRender 264 Gravity 225 Splatting 149 167% 213 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDPL2TB-D8 2TB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 286% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN163 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 1505 1516 1511 1527 1521 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	328% Outstanding	Read 2,378 Write 1,596 Mixed 1,138 SusWrite 1,514 370% 1,656 MB/s	4K Read 61.4 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 89.6 299% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,061 DQ Write 1,062 DQ Mixed 1,138 834% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 166% ↑ This bench: 328% Great: 382%
General UDisk 7GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Read 3.7 Write 2.7 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 4.3 5% 3.48 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.8% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	506x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	486x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	361x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	241x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	111x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $602

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16