To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '20 at 11:36
Run Duration	331 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 46 30% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 46 8-Core 46.1 6% 46 Pts	64-Core 46.2 3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7950 GT 351 User benchmarks, average bench 2% XFX(1682 2219) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 0.66 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2316RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 120 121 121 121 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.2% Average	Read 129 Write 114 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 115 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 23.8 84% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 58.8 DQ Mixed 29 26% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 25GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.9 13 8.6 17 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 16.1 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 11.5 23% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 130% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	706x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	101x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16