Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook E14 E402YA_E402YA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook E14 E402YA_E402YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E402YA
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 15:50
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7015 APU R2 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 47.9
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 41.2
26% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 44
8-Core 38.4
6% 41.2 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Asus(1043 1941) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.16.08
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1300_MTFDDAK256TDL 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 202 194 195 191 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 335
Write 311
Mixed 282
SusWrite 207
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 12.7
41% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 82.3
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 79.4
60% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook E14 E402YA_E402YA Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook E14 E402YA_E402YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback