PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160531 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Apr 16 '20 at 13:05 |
Run Duration | 252 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
513GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 141 149 126 139 129 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
40%
Below average
|
||||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
76GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 78 79 82 75 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
75GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 76 76 79 76 77 MB/s
|
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB
16GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
NSI External 500GB
47GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
46GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 89 90 91 88 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 10 11 11 11 9.9 MB/s
|
5.96%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 155x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 65x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |