Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5C-S0BTR
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 06 '15 at 23:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$230
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 133
46% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 187
26% 186 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 41% Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT620M
Sanyo(144D C652) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 1.53
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4.26
3% 4.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 399
Mixed 406
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 28.3
114% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 119
148% 261 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 109%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 16GB-$29
14GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 13.6
Mixed 18.4
23% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
23% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 31%
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 2,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback