Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 188 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 626 58% 485 Pts	64-Core 815 50% 815 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874E) ≥ 4GB; Asus tuf CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.4% Above average	Lighting 76.7 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 68.3 62% 71.9 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 53.1 50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 451 Write 450 Mixed 12.2 67% 304 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 4.4 47% 12 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 34.3 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 27.2 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	721x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	499x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	473x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	592x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	492x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	356x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $437

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16