Hp-pavilion KP304AA-ABU a6421.uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KP304AA-ABU a6421.uk  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NARRA3
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 65.6
42% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 63.6
8-Core 63.9
8% 63.8 Pts
64-Core 64.8
4% 64.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450
MSI(1462 1181) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.92 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.35
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 14 17 19 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 56.6
Write 59.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 22.8
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback