Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 20:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 645
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 75.4
Parallax 65.6
62% 72.4 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 72.3
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IRP-SSDPR-S25B-240 240GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 123 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 366
Write 216
Mixed 246
SusWrite 121
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 29.8
102% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 143
126% 191 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 111%
Team T253TD240G 240GB
195GB free
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 122 122 121 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 364
Write 223
Mixed 257
SusWrite 124
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 37.3
121% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 130
118% 182 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$49
496GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 141 142 143 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 162
Write 152
Mixed 38
SusWrite 142
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback