Asrock Z75 Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z75 Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '16 at 12:56
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 217 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 413 55% 413 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 76%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.41 2% 1.72 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Lighting 63.9 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 82.4 52% 68.2 fps	MRender 57.6 Gravity 52.2 Splatting 73.9 51% 61.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11615 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3479 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 184 184 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 759 (C2) HDA temperature 73 52 206159216667 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	81.1% Excellent	Read 509 Write 328 Mixed 492 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 30.8 99% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 110 112% 183 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 102%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 37GB free Firmware: VT100-50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 3 (03) Spinup time 253 253 6272 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20297 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18451 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8156 (BB) vendor-specific 94 94 2359303 (BE) vendor-specific 175 67 21 (C2) HDA temperature 175 67 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1205201 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	31.4% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 55.7 Mixed 53.9 41% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 38%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 474GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 26 Mixed 26.9 34% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.28 48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 288GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 24.9 Mixed 12.6 26% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.18 58% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team--Elite-1333 2x4GB 1,562 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z75 Pro3 - $105

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	76x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	71x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	16x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	14x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $466

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16