Huawei MACH-WX9

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Huawei MACH-WX9 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUAWEI MACH-WX9-PCB
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3000 x 2000 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	16.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '19 at 03:42
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 17.6 2-Core 40.6 32% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 156 16% 129 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(19E5 3E04) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 3.69 3% 6.97 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 3.77 Splatting 7.83 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 419 417 420 414 414 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,894 Write 1,549 Mixed 1,319 SusWrite 428 289% 1,298 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 59 188% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 45.1 DQ Write 476 DQ Mixed 371 254% 297 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 296%
Adata HD330 2TB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 9.5 Mixed 15 SusWrite 10.6 13% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCG 2x4GB 8,887 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 20.7 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MACH-WX9 Builds (Compare 828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Huawei MACH-WX9

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	705x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	123x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	630x
MX150-2NvidiaBench 11%, 5,332 samples	178x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	3x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	218x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	204x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	185x

RAM
MT52L1G32D4PG-093 2x8GBMicronBench 66%, 14,288 samples	391x
MT52L512M32D2PF-09 2x4GBMicronBench 67%, 6,726 samples	116x
K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 14,699 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16