PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P5925 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2584-A1 |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090205 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 30 '19 at 19:59 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
42.8%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
|
6.16%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
27GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 217 216 226 219 231 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 29 13 26 28 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
106GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 14 18 17 20 MB/s
|
8.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 3x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 4,070 samples | 2x |
Radeon X1300AMDBench 0%, 685 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $89 |