Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 03:25
Run Duration461 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 1,017
91% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,527
94% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 199
Parallax 179
144% 185 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 180
Splatting 129
118% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,119
Write 1,398
Mixed 905
324% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 68.6
266% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,239
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 459
433% 700 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
259GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2351 2001 1073 1075 1103 1103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2560
Write 2,339
Mixed 1,609
SusWrite 1,451
446% 1,990 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 99.7
342% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,217
DQ Mixed 1,272
956% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 354%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
369GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2360 2140 1098 1101 1095 1101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 2,347
Mixed 1,665
SusWrite 1,482
451% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 101
344% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 1,280
964% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 357%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
698GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 784 378 376 376 378 377 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
430GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 363 363 360 360 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 368
Mixed 337
SusWrite 363
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 44.4
150% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 241
182% 244 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 133%
Qnap Storage 537GB
435GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 446 446 443 445 455 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Drobo 5D 70.5TB
51TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 287 287 287 287 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 285
Mixed 212
SusWrite 286
351% 250 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 2.2
316% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 29.9
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 10.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,628
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback