Samsung 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP370R5E-S08SE
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '19 at 12:49
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 152 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 200 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C706) 2GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 215 192 185 179 177 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.3% Good	Read 255 Write 244 Mixed 231 SusWrite 197 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 32.3 106% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 199 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 124%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 64GB-$47 392 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 48GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 19 21 21 21 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.63% Terrible	Read 30 Write 18.3 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 18.6 22% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.3 61% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.63% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB 5,979 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	18x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	12x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	10x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	47x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	2x
SP580 120GBAdataBench 54%, 3,644 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	9x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	6x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16