Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-E  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090406
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 16:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5450-$220
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.8% Poor
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 92.5
34% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 144
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 146
10% 146 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Gigabyte(1458 3518) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 4.6
4% 11.6 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 8.1
4% 12.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$62
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 212 214 216 211 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 228
Write 216
Mixed 198
SusWrite 208
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 27.9
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 176
137% 188 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 58%
Great: 115%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$68
933GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 144 146 145 144 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73% Very good
Read 110
Write 117
Mixed 58
SusWrite 144
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
7GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 8.2 7.3 5 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 18
Mixed 18
SusWrite 6.9
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
116% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 1,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $316
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback