PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z390 UD (all builds) |
Memory | 26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190524 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 10 '19 at 16:32 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | COL-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
102%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
149%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 93 80 75 74 76 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
157GB free
Firmware: CC28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 114 117 117 115 MB/s
|
61%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
161GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 77 81 85 82 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3000DM008-2DM166 4TB
828GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 125 124 123 127 MB/s
|
||||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
690GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 56 50 31 21 72 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
76.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 2,782x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 2,403x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 1,470x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 991x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 811x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 597x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $795 |