PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110802 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 08 '19 at 12:27 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
89.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8 8.3 7.3 8.4 8.2 MB/s
|
22%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
216GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 11 10 11 9.2 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
85GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
131GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 19 20 MB/s
|
9.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
185GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 137 139 133 134 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 602x |
Core i7 960Intel $299Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 291x |
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 86x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 116x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $380 |