Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 21:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 162
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 542
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4141
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 41.9
8% 21.2 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 45.8
35% 42.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 249 247 262 264 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 660
Write 724
Mixed 691
SusWrite 299
134% 593 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 35.9
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 579
441% 598 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 108%
Great: 130%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 85 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 115
Write 121
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 87.4
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 79%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
15GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.6
4% 3.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback