Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5500-$18 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Memory 27.3 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 31.8 16% 25 Pts	4-Core 30.2 8-Core 34.7 4% 32.5 Pts	64-Core 20.5 1% 20.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50 2,106 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 52 33 26 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 15 Write 21.1 Mixed 12.6 SusWrite 29.3 14% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 51%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 7GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 17 15 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 11.8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 14.2 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 38%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 55GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.5 11 10 10 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 11.6 Mixed 15 SusWrite 9.9 18% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	6.88% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 1.1 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16