| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | CMS 7200-5409A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180702 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '19 at 23:10 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
98% 177 Pts
|
90% 736 Pts
|
70% 1,140 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
|
130%
Outstanding
|
149% 194 fps
|
114% 141 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2040 940 813 816 820 819 MB/s
|
289%
Outstanding
|
285% 1,267 MB/s
|
366% 143 MB/s
|
964% 1,279 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
4GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 4.4 4.5 3.8 5 5.4 MB/s
|
9.55%
Terrible
|
15% 15.3 MB/s
|
67% 2.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
81% 28.3 GB/s
|
74% 26 GB/s
|
68% 59.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 7200-5409A Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: CMS 7200-5409A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 13x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 8x |
| RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 3x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $806 |