Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 202 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 400 54% 400 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.2% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 108 Parallax 98.6 82% 103 fps	MRender 96.2 Gravity 94.3 Splatting 98.4 79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 3.2 35 103 145 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 415 Write 332 Mixed 162 SusWrite 114 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 12.2 68% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 89 DQ Mixed 44 49% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 55%
ChipsBnk Multi-Reader 64GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 28GB free, PID 4082 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 15 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 16.4 23% 17 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.4 234% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 1x8GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16