Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171031
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 16:46
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 275
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 904
86% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 37.8
29% 34.2 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 33.5
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 1821 1699 1386 1384 1349 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 1,612
Mixed 698
SusWrite 1,572
289% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 59.1
186% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 1080
818% 1,106 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 253%
Great: 353%
Samsung STORY Station 6TB
5TB free, PID 5f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 37 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 38.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 39.2
52% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 29
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback