Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 01:16
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 303
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,032
96% 799 Pts
64-Core 1452
90% 1452 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.51
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 200
Parallax 172
141% 182 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 173
Splatting 124
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
703GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1198 1189 1181 1179 1172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2121
Write 1,789
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 1,224
344% 1,540 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 66.2
259% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 873
674% 924 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 281%
Great: 302%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
856GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 779 110 115 109 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,525
Write 1,372
Mixed 1,055
SusWrite 434
245% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 78
266% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 325
399% 704 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 210%
Great: 282%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 23 31 45 45 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 107
Write 56.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 53.2
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46%
Great: 98%
Samsung MMCRE28G5MXP-0VB 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: VBM1901Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 326 255 136 136 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 105%
OCZ ATV 32GB
29GB free, PID ac02
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 15 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 11.7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 16.6
22% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
50% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 12%
Adata Nobility N005 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$80
40GB free, PID 105b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.2
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 25.5
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.9
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback