PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock N68-S3 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111110 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 28 '19 at 18:36 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 39 53 50 49 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
51.7%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF MARKVISION 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 32x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 25x |
Athlon II X2 270AMD $20Bench 43%, 6,369 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 15x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $101 |