Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 125 58% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 321 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3661) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 22.6 20% 22.1 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 25.2 Splatting 18.8 19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 255 268 287 298 267 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 393 Write 239 Mixed 103 SusWrite 272 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 10 42% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 12.9 12% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 256GB free Firmware: PB3ZC61H SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 72 74 73 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 75 Write 75.5 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 73.1 48% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 10.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16