Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus AM1M-A (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140428
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 14:55
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3 3,720 User benchmarks, average bench 34% FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 54 1-Core 31.6 2-Core 63 32% 49.5 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 118 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8623) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 3 2% 3.06 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.09 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 4.7 3.4 21 26 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 389 Write 285 Mixed 184 SusWrite 50.4 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 9.5 45% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 53.3 DQ Mixed 39.1 40% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 55%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 119 120 124 123 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 121 Write 118 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 121 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 32GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 1689 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.11% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 6.8 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 4.5 10% 9 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.11% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX CT51264BA160B.C16F 12GB 800, 800 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 6.1 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $44

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	34x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	17x
Sempron 2650 APU R3AMDBench 25%, 658 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	26x
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	6x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
SD8SN8U-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 75%, 1,494 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,528 samples	2x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8 1x4GBCrucialBench 27%, 1,234 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $82

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16