Asrock H55M-LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H55M-LE  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101020
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 102
52% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 191
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0042) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.09
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 180 167 163 164 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 216
Write 198
Mixed 192
SusWrite 170
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 33.9
111% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 49.7
42% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 153 177 166 106 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 172
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 153
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8.6 8 8.4 11 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 8.2
9% 7.48 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
358GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 31
Write 26.2
Mixed 20
SusWrite 12.2
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
671GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 12.5
28% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 49%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
8GB free, PID 2222
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.99% Terrible
Read 11
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.8
6% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
91% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-LE Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback