Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 201
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 440
59% 440 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 16
Parallax 19.5
12% 16.8 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15
Splatting 19
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200I610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 415 282 88 150 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 474
Write 344
Mixed 348
SusWrite 246
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 33
131% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 190
174% 262 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB
51GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 64 62 64 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 66.9
Write 63.8
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 63
77% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD4512NSE-CA3M2 MD4512NSE-CB4M2 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.3
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback