| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2912-A1 |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110406 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 30 '19 at 19:06 |
| Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
| Run User | SVN-User |
| Background CPU | 76% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41%
Average
|
42% 55.9 Pts
|
4% 32 Pts
|
3% 49.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1168) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1995
|
0.87%
Terrible
|
1% 1.07 fps
|
1% 1.19 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 47 47 67 73 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
45% 61.4 MB/s
|
85% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
|
32.7%
Below average
|
38% 51.9 MB/s
|
144% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
13% 4.63 GB/s
|
10% 3.63 GB/s
|
47% 85.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 70 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 23x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 15x |
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $130 |