MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 06:51
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 320
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 33.4
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 32.5
22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 415 414 426 423 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 424
Mixed 309
SusWrite 416
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 35.5
132% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 276
228% 327 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
22GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 381
Write 434
Mixed 300
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 38.2
152% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 141
125% 193 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
142GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 95 110 106 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 364
Write 183
Mixed 181
SusWrite 113
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 28.6
108% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 123
102% 146 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
15GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 36 33 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 16
Mixed 24
SusWrite 34.5
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 54%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
207GB free
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 41 45 41 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 22.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 43.1
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
490GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 63 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 63.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 62.6
73% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 19
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback