Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141028
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '19 at 06:37
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 143 59% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 279 38% 282 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5067 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 5.59 3% 5.54 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 5.39 4% 4.85 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 36 37 65 54 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 412 Write 176 Mixed 188 SusWrite 78.1 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 4.6 29% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 53%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 233GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 88 87 89 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 94.7 Write 63.3 Mixed 46 SusWrite 88.4 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler II+ 2GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 1601 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	7.96% Terrible	Read 25.5 Write 14 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 11.1 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 31% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 21GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 5.6 5.4 5.9 6 6 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	5.31% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 22.5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6.3 19% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.31% Great: 8%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.3 6.1 6.7 6.2 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 17.8 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 6.9 21% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.5 108% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 31%
General UDisk 4GB 5,358 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.6 7.2 6.4 7.9 7.1 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 6.5 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 6.9 11% 9.25 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 0215 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 12GB 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.2% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	49x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	48x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16